The chickens come home to roost

Spending hour after hour reading the US tax code, revenue rulings, and tax court cases does something to a person. First it drains them of all personality, until they become a veritable wellspring of sedateness. (I realize that sentence doesn’t make any sense) Second they relate all of life’s troubles to the relevant tax consequences. Finally they bring up tax law happenings as if people actually will find these things intriguing.

You can all tell the tax law specialist in any meeting – they are the one that doesn’t smile, doesn’t tell any jokes and generally is all round discomforting. The tax professional just scowl as they write cryptic notes on a legal pad – scribbles that look like some extra-terrestrial alien code.

Sometimes they will occasionally initiate odd tax code related dialogues, that seem pointless to everyone one but the tax person, who will be quite passionate about the issue.

Confident Tax Deity -“clearly we must consider code section 464 (b) (2) in this matter”.

Confused Meeting Attendee – “Uh you mean the cost of poultry purchased for sale shall be deducted for the taxable year in which the poultry is sold or otherwise disposed of?”

CTD – “well of course, or our goose is cooked.”

CMA – “but our chickens have not even hatched, but we did count them.”

CTD – “What you NEVER count them in a pre-hatched state that is clearly idiocy. I am surrounded by turkeys and loons! (That was pretty lame – I take full responsibility)

All problems, even personal relationship issues have tax implications to the tax practiced.

For example, a very good friend was relating an argument she was having with a companion who was also a business associate. My friend was pouring out her heart out on how her friend betrayed her by disclosing some very personal and embarrassing information to mutual acquaintances.

Then my cohort explained that the gossipy professional colleague also claimed she could not pay the full amount that she owed my associate for services rendered. The offending business owner claimed she had to pay tax on the proceeds on her personal tax return. So she could only pay my friend an “after tax amount” – I was outraged at the obvious tax fictionand  bellowed – that’s not true! – I knew the woman operated her business as a C Corp, which files its own tax return. She paid my friend as a 1099 independent contractor and did not withhold taxes. THE NERVE!!!

After about an hour explanation of the relevant tax rules, my pal had enough. Her words were something like – Girl, your job right now is to say – “oh NO she DID not do that, that B$%#@! “ Not give a big stupid tax speech on the difference between C companies or tax whachacallits. I don’t care about tax crap right now!

It confused me that she was not as upset about the tax misrepresentations. They were clearly relevant.

The worse offense though is bringing up recent tax decisions in ordinary conversation. Like starting a conversation at a local watering hole by loudly declaring – “Oh my god you won’t believe the published tax opinions today…blah blah..drone..blah… can you believe it. Yea they wanted to deny the increase in basis, I mean they made the contributions; it was a true economic outlay. Its madness”

The other happy drinkers are but now losing their buzz and plotting to ditch the square at the first chance. It’s funny the first seven times, but by the eighth it gets annoying.

Thankfully tax experts don’t socialize much.


5 thoughts on “The chickens come home to roost

  1. Stephanie Russo says:

    Ha ha… I do this. I take the opportunity to start talking about restraining orders or Family Court financial statements in every conversation I ever have. (I work in law and am soon to start studying).

    I’ve read a few posts lately and I am really enjoying your sense of humour. It’s awesome enjoying something other people find dry, isn’t it? Makes you feel like you’re rebelling and going against the norm… when perhaps you’re just not normal in the first place.

    • Gezabelle says:

      We are rebels with a boring cause …. I see a possible movie deal here


      • Stephanie Russo says:

        Can we incorporate the way my staples have to be parallel to the top edge of the paper?

      • Gezabelle says:

        OMG I do that too.

        I have a written policy on how documents are to be stapled, the allowable fonts on file labels and the order of documents in a tax file. I am super picky on document presentation – that is definitely going in the movie script… maybe our extreme attention to detail can save the world or something?

        Oh and can we get the work in the importance of where the “copy” or “confidential” stamp should be placed on the document?

  2. Stephanie Russo says:

    Yes! And the never-ending debate on whether the word ‘URGENT’ should be stamped onto the page, or typed into the document in the first place!

    Is anything ever urgent in tax law?

    (As a side note, one would hope that extreme attention to detail is what’s keeping us gainfully employed in the first place…)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s